Although water is not a nutrient
by definition, water is
essential for all life. Water is
needed for maintenance of
homeostasis, intercellular and
extracellular fluids, digestion
and absorption, transportation
of nutrients, and elimination of
wastes. Water is also the
universal solvent, and countless
elements, organic and inorganic
compounds, chemicals, and
contaminants can be contained in
water. The cleanliness, purity,
and adequacy of water is vital
for the maintenance of health.
As in the husbandry of any
captive animal population, the
quality of water utilized in
aviculture is vital for health
maintenance and avicultural
success. Acclimated adults birds
can withstand some level of
water contamination. An open
water container which becomes
contaminated with feces or food
will promote rapid bacterial
growth. Water containing added
vitamins can have a 100-fold
increase in bacterial count in
24 hours. Changing the water and
rinsing will reduce the level of
organic material and bacteria
but unless a surface is washed
and disinfected, an active
biofilm remains. Sources of
water may also be contaminated,
leading to infection, especially
if the numbers are amplified
when passing through the water
supply system.
Neonatal and juvenile birds,
however, have immature immune
systems and are much less
tolerant of environmental,
food-borne, and water
borne-bacteria. In the
psittacine nursery health
problems are routinely
associated with intestinal
infection with common gram
negative bacilli such as
Eschericia coli,
Klebsiella pneumoniae and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Access to potable water has
long been recognized as
essential to the health of
humans, and domestic animals.
The role of potential enteric
pathogens is also well
recognized in the health of
poultry and companion bird
species. Means of evaluation of
water supplies as well as means
of providing clean potable water
are import aspects of the
captive management of birds as
pets and in aviculture.
Certainly avian companion
species did not evolve in a
sterile world. Life in a
arboreal habitat, and frequent
changing of location however
would help to reduce overgrowth
of pathogens in close proximity
to the bird. Birds in captivity
are forced to remain confined to
a relatively small space where
build-up of pathogens can occur.
Water Quality in municipal
water systems
Modern hygienic standards
demand safe, reliable sources of
potable water. Municipal water
sources are precisely controlled
and continually monitored for
safety. Municipal water Supplies
are routinely required by local,
state and federal regulatory
agencies to sample water for
both inorganic and organic
chemicals. The regulations also
require sampling for bacterial
constituents. Both raw and
finished water is tested for
coliform bacteria. However there
are other species of bacteria
that are of pathogenic concern,
both to animals and humans. Many
of these non-coliform bacteria
species are present in raw
groundwater supplies. In most
cases, these bacteria were
introduced during construction
of wells by improper drilling
practices and/or improper
disinfection of drilling
equipment. The presence of these
types of bacteria is notorious
for causing bio-corrosion to
well casing and water treatment
systems. The destruction of
casing can introduce metals in
concentrations that may
adversely affect water quality.
The most common of these metal
producing species are
iron-reducing and
sulfur-reducing bacteria. Other
bacteria that are of significant
concern are opportunistic
pathogens such as Pseudomonas
aeruginosa. In most cases, plant
disinfection processes eliminate
this concern in the finished
water supply. Bacterial sampling
for all forms of bacteria,
fungi, and algae should be
performed on a routine basis.
The presence of algae would
indicate a direct connection
between a surface water body and
a groundwater body. While
regulations on municipal
supplies are extremely rigorous,
this is not the case for small
domestic users. Water supply
wells for domestic use usually
have one cloakroom bacteria
sample obtained after
construction of the well, and no
further testing is required.
Over time bacteria may enter the
system without the knowledge of
the owner, affecting the quality
of the water adversely. Many of
the smaller domestic treatment
systems, especially reverse
osmosis systems, have a tendency
to befoul, reducing the
efficiency of he unit and
eventually causing massive
bacterial buildup in the system,
especially if the filters are
not routinely changed. We
recommend that water supplies
being used for animal husbandry
and/or human consumption be
routinely checked for total
bacterial, fungal and algal
species.
Drilling contractors need to
become more educated regarding
proper disinfection practices
for drilling water supply wells.
This includes stream cleaing the
drilling rig and disinfecting
all drilling equipment with a
2,000 milligram per liter
chlorine concentration. In
addition, water used for mixing
drilling fluids must be from a
potable water supply source.
Well casings, well screens, and
gravel packs must also be
saturated in chlorine solutions
prior to installation in the
ground. After construction of
the well and prior to the well
being brought on line, the well
should be shock chlorinated and
tested for bacterial, fungal and
alga concentrations.
Well drilling companies can
introduce contamination at the
time of drilling if equipment is
not sterilized or if they pass
through contaminated strata when
drilling the well. Subterranean
water supplies can be
contaminated
Municipal water supplies must
also be routinely tested for
metals, radioisotopes, calcium
sodium chloride, hardness, total
solids, and numerous priority
pollutants including 129
chemicals (pesticides,
herbicides, and fertilizers).
Residential wells
Residential wells are often
contaminated (in South Florida)
and requirements for quality
assurance are minimal. Home
owners must only check
initially, at the time of
installation and the well is
typically tested only for
cloakroom bacteria. Public
health labs which test new well
installations utilize standard
aerobic methods and look only
for fecal and non- fecal
cloakrooms. Such gross
contamination would be a sign of
direct sewage line, or mammalian
or avian fauna falling into the
well, surface water entering the
well, etc. The methods used
would frequently miss
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Aeromonas hydrophila and other
free living saprophytic
opportunistic pathogens.
Biofilms, are a gelatinous
matrix from the elaborated
exoenzymes, proteinaceous
exudates and mucous produced by
bacteria. These biofilms look
like mucous, often green and
slimy. Biofilms in wells can
include numerous bacterial
species including Aeromonas
hydrophilla, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, Pseudomonas
fluorescens, Acinetobacter sp.,
Enterobacter agglomerans and a
myriad of gram negative bacteria
occasionally Klebsiella
pneumoniae.
Corrosion on the wall of the
well casing can eliminate the
sanitary seal provided by the
casing. Biofilms can also
contain iron-sulfur bacteria
such as Sameretilus natans,
Gallionella ferruginea and
Thiobacillus sp. The end product
of some sulfur reducing bacteria
is sulfuric-acid causing
dysfunction of the well casing,
pumps and plumbing. Iron
bacteria also corrodes steel
well casing. Enzymes and
chemicals produced by these
bacteria can cause etching and
degradation of well casings,
pumps, water equipment.
Low level well contamination
can be exacerbated by poorly
selected or maintained water
filtration equipment. This is a
very common problem with reverse
osmosis systems, where biofilms
form on the membranes of the
system. The mixture of organisms
produces elastases and
collagenases which will erode
and dissolve membranes. Prior to
scheduled maintenance and
changing filters, often times
there is more bacteria in the
water coming out of the filter
than going in. Occasionally,
algae is found in a well which
is not completely anaerobic.
This would indicate a connection
to the aquifer to surface water
supplies an a nutrient source
being directly interconnected
with the well. Because water
entering the well bore moves
quicker than flow further away
from the well, the provision of
nutrients is accelerated. If the
biofilm grows it may clog the
pore spaces in the aquifer
causing the well to have
excessive draw downs, adversely
impacting the equipment.
Free living micro-organisms,
by virtue of their ability to
survive adverse environmental
conditions can derive their
nutrients from organic mater,
plants, dissolved solids and
even hydrocarbons.
To assess the microbiological
population in water, one must
trap existing micro-organisms on
a .45u filter in a specified
volume of water. The filter is
then placed directly on nutrient
agar. This will render a
numerical value of colony
forming units (CFU) per volume
of water. Identification of
isolated colonies on the
membrane filter can then proceed
by standard microbiological
methods.
Chlorination
Chlorination has historically
been used in municipal water
systems to maintain water
hygiene. Recommended levels of
chlorine in water systems is
usually 0.5 - 1 ppm. Some local
municipalities run higher. Three
(3.0) ppm safe for swimming but
in some pools probably 9-10 PPM
may occur. In reverse osmosis
systems,excessive chlorine will
disrupt membranes and may also
be corrosive.
No bacteria are known to be
resistant to chlorine at the
proper concentration. Some
parasites however, most notably
Cryptosporidium cannot be
controlled by chlorination. In
order to detect Cryptosporidium
large quantities of water,
hundreds of gallons, must be
filtered and the filter examined
microscopically using an Acid
Fast stain.
Should the well be found to
contain bacteria, especially
biofilms, it is virtually
impossible to eliminate the
bacteria from the system. Common
practice has been to shock
chlorinate the well similar to
the shock chlorination of a
swimming pool. It is important
to determine the volume of the
well casing and well bore and to
displace that quantity of water
with a chlorine solution of
between 2,000 and 6,000
milligrams per liter. This
chlorine solution should be
allowed to remain in the well
for a period of 24 hours and
then flushed to waste. This
procedure may be required to be
performed on a routine basis to
control the presence of bacteria
in the well. Furthermore, it may
also be appropriate to add a
disinfection system at the well
to mitigate bacteria in the
water supply.
Water contamination
problems in five avicultural
facilities
Outbreaks of bacterial
enteric infections and
subsequent disease in both
adults and juveniles were traced
to contaminated water supplies
at five avicultural facilities.
In all five facilities, general
health conditions of all stock
and growth and survivability of
hand fed chicks improved after
measures were taken to improve
water quality.
Facility #1
Gross contamination of well -
This facility, breeding both
primates and numerous species of
psittacine birds experienced
high mortality of both breeder
birds and chicks. The water
supply was from an old, shallow
well estimated to be 30 feet
deep. Caging had been built in
close proximity to the well and
the potential for feces from
both primates and birds to
filter into the ground was high.
The potential for surface water
to enter the well was also
present. Water was supplied to
the birds by way of
polyvinylclhoride (PVC) pipes
with nipple drinkers. Blind ends
were common in the system and no
method for flushing or
disinfecting of the system was
available.
Nipple drinkers were cultured
by swabbing and standard plating
techniques, revealing widespread
contamination with E. Coli,
Enterobacter sp. and Klebsiella
sp. Water lines were
subsequently flushed with a
strong solution (concentration
unknown) of sodium hypochlorite
(Chlorine bleach). Chlorinated
water was introduced into the
lines and then water pressure
was turned off to prevent
drinking. After 2-3 hours the
lines were flushed with clean
water. All water lines were
altered so that no blind ends
existed which could be a site
for stagnation. Faucets and
sprinkler timers were installed
and would periodically open
resulting in flushing of water
lines. Water cleanliness and
incidence of disease was reduced
but not satisfactorily.
Access to the well was
obtained for direct culture
(often not allowed by
municipalities). One gallon of
water was collected in a plastic
container from which distilled
water was removed. After
determination that the well was
grossly contaminated, the owner
decided to drill a new, deeper
well upon assurance of the well
driller that the resultant water
would be excellent quality.
After installation of the new
well, reported to be some 150
feet deep installation of
ancillary equipment including a
new pump, holding tank,
particulate filter, and
evaporator to remove sulfur, the
problem again subsided
temporarily. Approximately 4
months after installation of the
new well, mortality again began
to rise. The well was again
tested and found to be
contaminated with Pseudomonas
aeruginosa. At that time an
injection chlorinator was
installed in the lines prior to
the holding tank. Routine
monitoring of the injection
chlorinator was emphatically
recommended by the supplier.
Subsequent to chlorination the
bacterial enteritis problem was
reduced to a very low level.
Continuous monitoring of
chlorine levels and weekly
maintenance of the system is
vital to prevent problems Long
term effects of chlorination are
not known in birds and
appropriate levels of
chlorination are assumed to be
similar to those appropriate to
human consumption. Subsequently
the chlorine levels were checked
and found to be in excess of 3
PPM. The chlorine levels are now
routinely monitored on a weekly
basis to detect problems of
over/under chlorinating.
Monitoring was done with a pool
chlorine testing kit.
Facility #2
Low level contamination of
water was causing repeated
outbreaks of bacterial problems
in a psittacine nursery. Upon
manufacturers recommendation
that ìmedically pureî water
could be obtained by
installation of a reverse
osmosis water purification
system, the system was installed
under the sink with a separate
faucet supplied for the unit. A
few months later the problem
returned with cultures in chicks
being primarily Escherichia
coli, Enterobacter sp.
Klebsiella sp.Acinetobacter, and
occasionally Pseudomonas
aeruginosa. Faucets were
cultured by swabbing and plating
and were found to be heavily
contaminated with predominately
Pseudomonas sp. and Klebsiella
sp.. Lines were chlorinated and
filters changed. A few months
later the problem re-occurred.
At this time the well was
sampled and found to be
contaminated with Pseudomonas.
An in line UV light sterilizer
was then installed between the
well and the reverse osmosis
(RO) unit. RO filters are
religiously changed every few
months (More frequently than
recommended). The problem has
been minimized since that time.
Facility #3
Facility 3 also had a well
contamination problem discovered
subsequent to a chick mortality
problem. This facility had an
old well and had installed a
reverse osmosis system for the
nursery. The manager could not
remember when the reverse
osmosis system was last
serviced. A strong concentration
of a disinfectant solution
(Virkon) was used to wash
syringes which were then rinsed
and allowed to air dry prior to
use. Formula was prepared using
bottled water. Heavy
contamination was found in water
faucets, syringes, reverse
osmosis filters and in the well.
A commercial company was hired
to clean the well by a vacuuming
process which removed a large
amount of organic debris. An
injection chlorination system
was installed and the reverse
osmosis system was put on a
routine maintenance schedule.
Facility #4
A specialty pet shop selling
primarily hand fed psittacines
had concerns about the
cleanliness of the municipal
water supply and changed to a
bottled water provided in 5
gallon bottle and utilizing
dispenser which was capable of
supplying both hot and cold
water. This water was used for
mixing hand-rearing formula.
Subsequently the chicks began to
develop problems and cultures
revealed frequent bacterial
infections, primarily again E
coli, Klebsiella and
occasionally Pseudomonas.
Culture of water from the
dispenser revealed
contamination. The owner changed
to a tilting holder which
supported the bottle but allowed
water to be poured from the
bottle without passing through a
dispenser. Subsequent problems
were dramatically reduced.
Facility #5
This facility was
experiencing excessive dead in
shell and cultures revealed
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
predominately. Attempts at
treatment of birds were
palliative. Injection of
antibiotics into the eggs was
frequently practiced. Upon
visiting the farm it was
discovered that the breeder was
using water bottles for the
breeding birds. All water
bottles were cleaned and
bleached weekly. Bottles were
exposed to sunlight. Pseudomonas
infections were common in the
breeding stock . The breeder
removed all bottles and
installed a fall through
watering system. All adult birds
were treated with Enrofloxacin
(according to antibiogram) but
some subsequent failures of
therapy were found. These birds
were subsequently treated by use
of an inactivated, autogenous
bacterin. Subsequent egg
infections and mortality was
within normal limits.
|
Sources of water |
Possible points of
contamination |
|
City water supplies |
Poorly maintained
systems, ie. Developing
countriesOld pluming -
contamination in water
linesContaminated water
filtersContaminated
transport containers,
hosesBroken water lines |
|
Bottled water |
Poor quality product -
contamination at
sourceContamination of
dispenser |
|
Well water |
Contamination of
wellSeepage of surface
water into
wellContamination of
holding tanks,
equipmentBroken water
lines |
|
Automatic waterers |
Contaminated water
linesContamination of
drinkersContamination of
filtersInfection in
mouth of birds moving
into systemBroken water
lines |
|
Water bowls |
Dunking foodsInadequate
washingAddition of
vitamins,
supplementsDipping bowls
in bucket of waterHands
- wiping debris from
bowls as filling |
|
Water bottles |
Infrequent
washingInfection in
mouth of birds moving
into system |
|
Fall through water
systems |
Contamination on wire |
|
Handfeeding nursery |
Contamination of
incoming water
suppliesContamination of
filters (especially
reverse osmosis
systems)Poor utensil
hygieneContamination of
formula from birds mouth |
References:
Brue, Randal
N.(1994), Nutrition, In Avian
Medicine: Principles and
Application, BW Ritchie, GJ.
Harrison and LR. Harrison (eds),
Wingers Publishing, Lake Worth,
FL, 1994. pp 63-95.
Clubb, S.L. (1996),
Aviculture Medicine and Flock
Health Management, In Avian
Medicine and Surgery, RA Altman,
SL Clubb, G Dorrestein and K
Quesenberry (eds), W.B. Saunders
Co., Philadelphia, PA, 1996 pp
101-116.
Fudge, A.M., Reavill,
D.R., Rosskopf, W.J.(1992),
Clinical aspects of avian
Pseudomonas infections: A
retrospective study, Proceedings
of Association of Avian
Veterinarians., New Orleans, LA,
pp 141-155.
Drewes, LA and K.
Flammer, Clinical Microbiology,
In Clinical Avian Medicine and
Surgery, GJ Harrison and LR
Harrison (eds) W B Saunders Co,
Philadelphia, PA 1986. pp.
157-171.
Dorrestein, Gerry,
Bacteriology, In Avian Medicine
and Surgery, Altman, Clubb,
Dorrestein and Quesenberry, W.B.
Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA,
1996 pp 255-280.
Johnson, T and Clubb,
K (1992), Aviary Construction,
In Psittacine Aviculture
Perspectives, Techniques and
Research, Schobut, Clubb and
Clubb, Avicultural Breeding and
Research Center, Loxahatchee,
FL, 1992. Pp-
Anonymous, (1997)
Water microbiology, Lab and
field procedures. (Technical
Manual) Millipore Systems,
Bedford, MA 01730